Skip to content

Image: substackcdn.com · rights & removal

Fighting AI slop with human insight

Reporting by Venture in Security (Ross Haleliuk)Read the original at ventureinsecurity.net

Objectivity score: 54 out of 100.
Difficulty 55 out of 100 (Graduate)— Read Analysis

Executive Summary

The author took a break from writing and posting due to feeling overwhelmed by what they perceived as "AI slop" in the cyber media space, noting that comments on LinkedIn and Substack were often AI-generated, leading to questioning the value of content creation. This pause led to a realization that the need for the Venture in Security perspective remains critical, especially given the rapidly evolving cybersecurity landscape shaped by AI. The author argues that the industry now suffers from more noise and less genuine insight, suggesting that what is needed is authentic human judgment derived from lived experience rather than easily generated content. The commitment moving forward is to provide clear, structured insights every two weeks on Venture in Security and daily updates on LinkedIn, focusing on human perspective, real experiences, and avoiding dependence on vendor narratives.

Facts Only

* The author took a break from writing for nearly two months.
* The author posted much on LinkedIn during this time.
* The need for a break was due to life demands and the consumption of time/mental capacity building a company.
* The author felt they were "drowning in AI slop" in comments on LinkedIn and Substack.
* The author questioned the point of writing when content is easily generated by AI.
* The author realized they did not want Venture in Security to become another contributor to noise.
* Venture in Security emerged from a need for understanding the industry ecosystem, rather than a planned endeavor.
* The initial work focused on product-led growth in cyber, leading to articles and a weekly Substack blog.
* The current realization is that more insight and judgment are needed than content.
* The author commits to providing clarity and structured insights every two weeks on Venture in Security and daily updates on LinkedIn.

Full Take

The narrative functions as a defense of intellectual sovereignty against the perceived devaluation of original thought in an AI-saturated media environment. The core tension lies between scalable content creation (the ease offered by AI) and the value of deeply contextualized, personally experienced insight. The author positions themselves not as a content generator but as a curator of necessary perspective—a necessary friction against the homogeneity introduced by automated synthesis. The recognition that public discourse is currently filled with easily digestible but shallow information compels a shift from volume to authentic depth. This suggests a structural pattern where attention economics rewards superficial repetition, forcing genuine expertise into an adversarial stance against algorithmic noise. The implied implication is that true influence resides in irreducible human perspective, which requires effort—a challenge to the systems rewarding frictionless content flow. The vulnerability of the author's argument rests on maintaining the perceived authenticity while simultaneously offering structured analysis, navigating the fine line between personal observation and marketable insight. Bridge questions for further inquiry involve how observers distinguish genuine lived experience from sophisticated simulation, what mechanisms can be built to reward critical depth over sheer output, and where the boundary lies between necessary transparency and self-censorship in expert commentary.

From the original · Venture in Security (Ross Haleliuk)

It’s been nearly two months since the previous issue of Venture in Security, and since I posted much on LinkedIn. I didn’t plan for this break.
Read the full story at ventureinsecurity.net

Sentinel — Human

Confidence

The text reads as a reflective personal manifesto where the author uses their lived experience of navigating the content landscape to articulate a renewed commitment to providing authentic, high-value industry insight.

Signals Detected
low severity: Sentence length variance shows natural variation; occasional use of emphatic, slightly rambling structures typical of personal reflection.
low severity: The text exhibits a strong, evolving personal narrative focused on a specific thesis (the value of authentic insight over content), demonstrating a cohesive emotional and intellectual arc.
low severity: Arguments flow logically from personal frustration (AI slop) to a statement of purpose (Venture in Security's role), avoiding the mechanical repetition often seen in pure AI outputs.
low severity: The content relies heavily on personal experience ('I realized,' 'I felt') and specific context (building a company, specific industry observation) which is difficult for generic LLMs to convincingly replicate without being prompted directly.
Human Indicators
Strong idiosyncratic voice and personal reflection on the process of content creation and the current state of the industry.
Use of specific, emotionally charged framing ('drowning in AI slop', 'AI slop') that anchors the argument in lived experience.
The focus shifts from objective reporting to subjective philosophy regarding authenticity and insight.
Fighting AI slop with human insight | Huntaegis