2026 saw new software supply chain attacks landing almost every week, and malicious actors are showing no sign of letting up. In August, attackers compromised the maintainer behind keyv, a caching library pulling roughly 127 million weekly downloads, and pushed a credential-stealing worm across the entire package family. Enterprise teams need best-in-class Software Composition Analysis (SCA) to keep up.
A CVE-matching tool won't cut it. Malware almost never assigned a CVE, malicious packages are pulled from the registry within hours, and they follow a different lifecycle than a disclosed vulnerability. NIST no longer keeps pace with CVE volume anyway.
Enterprise-tier SCA starts with real-time intelligence on threats that never touch a CVE database, then turns findings into fixes developers will act upon, enforces policy and governance across every repo, and ties it all to compliance. This post compares the top SCA tools for enterprise on real-time intelligence, governance and policy enforcement, compliance coverage, and triage that holds up at scale. We cover:
- Aikido Security
- Sonatype
- Snyk
- Endor Labs
- Checkmarx
- Black Duck
- Veracode
TL;DR
Aikido Security offers the strongest SCA for enterprise teams because of its real-time supply chain intelligence feed, which detects both malware and vulnerabilities that don’t have CVEs assigned in open-source ecosystems. Aikido's world-class researchers maintain the LLM-powered pipeline to find malware and validate the most malicious cases by hand. Its exploitability agent reads how each package is used in your own code and reasons about whether a CVE is actually exploitable, which is why its latest update removes false positives entirely where other tools stop at 80 to 90 percent. When the fix for a vulnerability isn't a simple upgrade, Aikido Libraries provides patched versions of the packages you already run, so the fix lands without a version bump or an API change. And Device Protection covers what gets installed on developer machines and blocks malicious packages and extensions across the organization. On the governance side, it brings the policy controls, portfolio-wide SBOM and license management, and CI/CD gating that enterprises need to enforce standards across teams and satisfy CRA and NIS2. Enterprises including Visma and Revolut use Aikido for SCA.
{{false-positives}}
Why SCA is necessary for enterprises
Open source software makes up 70-90% of a modern application, so an attacker doesn't need to breach you directly, just a package you already trust. Every dependency is a potential entry point, and with AI lowering the cost of finding and weaponizing them, a vulnerable package is an easy target. At enterprise scale, one poisoned dependency can sit in dozens of applications at once, greatly increasing the damage of a breach.
In March, the axios maintainer account was hijacked and used to ship a cross-platform remote access trojan (RAT) to a library with over 100 million weekly downloads. In April, Bitwarden's CLI was backdoored by a Shai-Hulud variant that hunted specifically for logged-in AI coding tools like Claude Code and Cursor.
AI is widening the gap from the other side too. A growing share of production code is now AI-generated, and coding agents pull in dependencies faster than anyone can review them. That has created a new class of risk in slopsquatting, where attackers register the package names LLMs tend to hallucinate and wait for an agent to install one on your behalf. One study generating 576,000 code samples across 16 models found package hallucination rates averaging 5.2% for commercial models and 21.7% for open-source ones.
On top of the security exposure, compliance frameworks like CRA and NIS2 now require supply chain security. Enterprises should also look for consistent policy and visibility across many repos and teams rather than each group securing dependencies its own way.
How we evaluated these SCA tools for enterprises
Not every SCA tool is built for an enterprise. We weighed the criteria that matter when you're securing hundreds of repos across thousands of developers.
Real-time malware and vulnerability intel
The fastest-moving supply chain threats never get a CVE, so we looked at how each tool sources its intelligence. Most maintain their own research and a database of known-bad packages. The sharper distinction is whether that runs as a real-time pipeline analyzing new releases as they publish, or as a curated database that flags threats once they're reviewed and added.
Reachability and triage that survive at scale
Classic SCA matches dependencies against a vulnerability database and surfaces everything it finds, most of which isn't reachable or exploitable. We favored tools that trace whether your code actually reaches a vulnerability and prioritize accordingly.
Automated remediation
We looked at whether a tool can generate the fix, open a merge-ready pull request, and handle the cases where a clean upgrade doesn't exist. The best tools shorten the distance between a finding and a merged fix
Policy enforcement and gating across the whole org
Enterprises need consistent rules applied everywhere and the ability to gate risky changes before they merge. The test is whether a tool can enforce those rules at the point they'd otherwise ship.
Governance
RBAC, SSO, and separation of duties between who approves a finding and who fixes it, so security scales without slowing every team down. Auditors and CISOs also need to see who changed what and when, so access controls and clear ownership are what make a security program defensible.
Portfolio-wide SBOM management and license policy
Maintaining an accurate inventory across the whole portfolio, flagging risky licenses, and producing the evidence auditors want for CRA and NIS2 is the enterprise requirement. SBOMs need to be current and queryable so that when the next keyv lands, you can tell in minutes which applications are exposed.
Aikido Security
Aikido SCA scans your dependencies for CVEs, malware, license, and end-of-life issues, then prioritizes what's actually reachable. It runs reachability analysis, tracing whether your code actually reaches a vulnerable function, and then goes a step further. Its exploitability agent reads how each package is actually used in your repository and reasons about whether a given CVE is genuinely exploitable in your context. That extra step is the difference between cutting noise and eliminating it. Where reachability-based tools reduce false positives by 80 to 90 percent, Aikido's latest update removes 100%. It also flags risky licenses, spots unmaintained packages, and groups related fixes into clean tickets.
What powers all of it is Aikido Intel, a real-time feed tracking both malware and vulnerabilities across open-source ecosystems. Intel's malware pipeline monitors packages across npm, PyPI, Maven, and 15+ other ecosystems, running each new release through static rules, sandbox detonation, and an AI layer, with researchers confirming the hardest cases by hand. In Q2 2026, it analyzed around 7.5 million package versions and confirmed 19,500 malicious ones, catching most within eight minutes. On the vulnerability side, it spots security fixes maintainers ship quietly and publishes an advisory with its own Aikido Vulnerability ID.
Key features
- Risk-based prioritization: focuses on exploitable issues by reachability and data sensitivity, cutting noise from irrelevant CVEs.
- Advanced malware detection: catches hidden scripts, exfiltration, typosquatting, and dependency confusion across npm, PyPI, Go, Rust, and more, based on what a package does rather than known signatures.
- Automated remediation: AutoFix PRs, plus ticketing and alerts through Slack, Jira, and GitHub Actions.
- Broad coverage: one tool across IDE, Git, CI, containers, and cloud, with duplicate findings correlated.
- Fast: scans run in under two minutes, even on large repos.
- Extensive language support: all major ecosystems, with no lockfile needed for C/C++ and .NET.
- Flexible deployment: cloud, on-prem, or local CLI for privacy-sensitive teams.
- SBOMs: generated and maintained automatically, with risky-license and EOL flags.
- Predictable pricing: up to 50% savings versus comparable tools.
Avoiding the upgrade trap
Most SCA tools hand you a CVE and tell you to upgrade, which falls apart when the patched version has breaking changes, or no patched version exists yet. When there's a straightforward upgrade, AutoFix opens a merge-ready pull request with the change already made. When there isn't, Aikido Libraries provides a patched build of the exact version already in your lockfile, across ecosystems with no other changes other than the security patches, to avoid complicated changes across the codebase. At the container layer, Aikido Images does the same for base images, clearing high and critical CVEs to an SLA using backports and selective upgrades on the OS and distro you already run.
Stopping malware before it reaches a developer
For enterprises, the highest-leverage place to stop a supply chain attack is the moment of install, before malicious code ever runs on a developer machine or in CI. Aikido Device Protection covers that layer across the organization, guarding every developer endpoint against malicious packages and extensions and blocking installs at the point they'd otherwise execute. It's the enterprise counterpart to Aikido Safe Chain, a free, open-source tool that sits beside your package manager and blocks any npm install that's confirmed malware or less than 24 hours old. Both draw on the Intel feed, so what the research team confirms is what gets blocked at the endpoint.
Aikido also brings the governance an enterprise program runs on, with policy enforcement, RBAC, and SSO, plus portfolio-wide SBOM generation and license management that support NIS2 and CRA compliance. Aikido is trusted for SCA at enterprise scale by companies including Visma and Revolut.
{{walkthrough}}
Sonatype
Sonatype Lifecycle, backed by the Nexus repository, is known for enterprise governance. Its defining feature is the Sonatype Repository Firewall, which blocks malicious or policy-violating components at download time. Paired with a configurable policy engine, it fits large organizations that route everything through their artifact repository and treat it as the control point for the SDLC.
Intelligence comes from Sonatype's own research team and its component database, with some threats flagged ahead of CVE assignment. Remediation assistance recommends the safest upgrade path that resolves violations across direct and transitive dependencies without breaking changes.
The trade-offs show up in coverage and control. Reviewers report many false negatives in JavaScript SCA and that policy tuning can be complex and time-consuming. And because the firewall and policy engine are most powerful when you've standardized on Nexus as your repository, the value is highest for teams already committed to Sonatype's stack.
Features
- Repository Firewall that blocks malicious and policy-violating components at download.
- Customizable policy engine with a waiver dashboard for tracked exemptions.
- Golden Pull Requests recommending upgrade paths with no breaking changes.
- 140M+ component intelligence database with some pre-CVE research.
- 20+ languages, IDE plugins, CI/CD gates, and on-prem or Kubernetes deployment.
Best for: large enterprises that run Nexus as their artifact repository and want policy enforcement and malware blocking at the repository layer. But not teams that haven't standardized on Nexus, since the firewall model is weakest when components don't all flow through one repository.
Snyk
Snyk remains an option for SCA. Snyk Open Source finds vulnerabilities and license issues across 10+ package ecosystems, uses application context and reachability to prioritize the issues that are actually deployed or exposed, and opens automated pull requests to remediate them. It runs a large, curated vulnerability database maintained by its security research team, and catalogs malicious packages directly, so it covers both disclosed CVEs and malware without waiting on a public feed.
Remediation runs through automated pull requests for upgrades. When no safe upgrade exists for a given Node.js file, Snyk may be able to patch the vulnerability.
The trade-offs surface at enterprise scale. The recurring theme is cost, with per-developer pricing that climbs quickly and draws frequent complaints, alongside reported friction with support. Reviewers have also flagged limits in its reachability analysis, which depends on context Snyk lacks without a runtime agent. And Snyk has broadened its suite faster than it has deepened core SCA.
Features
- Reachability and application-context prioritization to cut noise from unreachable issues.
- Automated fix pull requests for dependency upgrades.
- Malicious-package coverage alongside a large, curated vulnerability database.
- SBOM export and testing for software-transparency requirements.
- IDE, Git, CI, and container integration across 10+ ecosystems.
Best for: teams that want a mature, developer-friendly SCA with strong integrations and can absorb the cost at scale.
Endor Labs
Endor Labs is a newer entrant focused on reachability. It builds a call graph across your code, dependencies, and container images, then traces data flow to the vulnerable function to determine whether a CVE is actually reachable, deprioritizing anything buried in a code path your application never runs. It combines public vulnerability data with its own research, and adds behavioral detection for malware, typosquatting, and reachability analysis.
It backs that with function-level analysis across 40+ languages, dependency health signals like maintainer activity and version freshness, malware and typosquatting detection,. For a security team whose main pain is alert volume, the noise reduction is the draw.
Its remediation story is thinner than its detection story. Endor markets AI agents that propose and apply fixes, but that capability is newer than the reachability analysis it's known for, and its track record in production is thinner. Pricing is opaque, reported to start around $20,000 a year. And as a younger brand, its documentation and community are lighter than incumbents like Snyk or Black Duck. Reviewers note that the UI/UX experience requires improvement, and difficult setup of Endor Labs can be challenging.
Features
- Function-level reachability across code, dependencies, and container images.
- 40+ language support with vulnerability coverage going back years.
- Dependency health scoring: maintainer activity, version freshness, license.
- AI-assisted remediation that proposes and can apply fixes.
Best for: security teams whose priority is cutting SCA noise through deep reachability analysis, and don't mind the growing pains of a newer tool.
Checkmarx
Checkmarx SCA lives inside Checkmarx One alongside SAST, DAST, API security, and IaC. It offers reachability analysis that correlates SCA findings with the SAST engine to trace whether your own code actually calls the vulnerable function and maintains a proprietary malicious-package database alongside standard CVE coverage. It scans transitive dependencies including private JFrog Artifactory registries, and generates CycloneDX SBOMs with CVSS 4.0 scoring.
The trade-offs are cost, complexity, and fit. Checkmarx is licensed per contributing developer with each module billed separately and pricing available only through sales. Reviewers note that the out-of-the box reporting for executive stakeholders can feel rigid and require customization. Additionally, reviewers point to weak license coverage and compliance policy management.
Features
- Exploitable Path reachability that correlates SCA with SAST to confirm reachable vulnerabilities.
- Behavioral malicious-package detection against a 400,000+ package database.
- Transitive dependency scanning to unlimited depth, including private Artifactory registries.
- CycloneDX SBOM generation with CVSS 4.0 scoring and license risk management.
- Unified Checkmarx One platform correlating SCA, SAST, DAST, API, and IaC findings.
Best for: enterprises consolidating their full AppSec program on one platform and wanting SCA findings correlated with SAST for prioritization. Not for teams after best-in-class standalone SCA, or those who need clean license compliance and flexible reporting out of the box.
Black Duck
Black Duck is an enterprise SCA tool whose strength is depth in open-source license and copyright management, and it remains a common choice for teams where deep license visibility and audit continuity are the priority. Intelligence centers on its long-established KnowledgeBase for open-source component, license, and vulnerability data, drawn from public advisories and its own research. Strong on license and provenance data, lighter on real-time malware detection. It covers SCA, SBOM, and license compliance well, generates the evidence auditors expect, and handles DAST and API scanning alongside its core dependency work.
The trade-offs are breadth, automation, and developer fit. Reviewers cite resource-heavy scans, limited accuracy for C++, as well as issues with integrations and SBOM imports. Its SCA is the center of gravity, with SAST handled through a separate product (Coverity), and reachability and container coverage are narrower than newer platforms. Deployment leans on-prem with onboarding measured in weeks. Its compliance framing is also specifically about license and copyright rather than mapping findings to security-control frameworks.
Features
- Deep open-source license and copyright compliance with mature audit trails
- SBOM generation
- DAST and API scanning
- SAST available through Coverity as a separate product
- Primarily on-prem deployment for regulated environments
Best for: compliance and legal teams that need deep open-source license management and long-term audit continuity. Not for teams using C++ or who need framework control mappings.
Veracode
Veracode has been in enterprise AppSec since 2006. Its SCA covers vulnerability and license risk with reachability analysis to trace whether a vulnerable function is actually called. Vulnerability data plus behavioral malicious-package detection from the January 2025 Phylum acquisition, which added typosquatting and dependency-confusion analysis. The malware capability is newer to the platform than its core CVE coverage.
It generates CycloneDX and SPDX SBOMs and offers both agent-based scanning in CI and upload-and-scan for compiled binaries. That binary path matters for its core buyer, since source code never has to leave the developer's environment, which suits organizations whose policies forbid sharing it. FedRAMP, SOC 2, and ISO certifications make it a safe procurement choice for banking, healthcare, government, and defense.
The trade-offs are that SCA is not where Veracode is strongest, plus cost and complexity. Its remediation story is the newest piece. Veracode Fix for SCA was announced in early 2026, so autofix for open-source findings is unproven compared with tools that have shipped it for years. Pricing is quote-only and enterprise-scale, with SCA reported to start around $12,000 a year and a licensing model that often requires a separate license per application, which gets expensive fast for microservice-heavy portfolios. Reviewers cite slow scanning speed and poor customer support.
Features
- Agent-based CI scanning plus upload-and-scan for compiled binaries.
- Reachability analysis to prioritize vulnerable methods actually reachable in your code.
- Malicious-package detection via Phylum, covering typosquatting and dependency confusion.
- CycloneDX and SPDX SBOM generation with policy-based build gating.
- SOC 2, and ISO certifications for regulated procurement.
Best for: regulated enterprises whose priority is compliance credentials, FedRAMP especially, and keeping source code in-house, and who can absorb enterprise pricing.
FAQ

{
"@context": "https://schema.org"
"@graph": [
{
"@type": "BlogPosting",
"@id": "https://www.aikido.dev/blog/top-enterprise-sca-tools-2026#article"
"isPartOf": { "@id": "https://www.aikido.dev/blog/top-enterprise-sca-tools-2026#webpage" },
"mainEntityOfPage": { "@id": "https://www.aikido.dev/blog/top-enterprise-sca-tools-2026#webpage" },
"headline": "Top Enterprise SCA Tools 2026",
"description": "A hands-on comparison of the top enterprise software composition analysis (SCA) tools for 2026, rated on real-time malware intelligence, remediation, governance, and CRA/NIS2 compliance.",
"articleSection": "DevSec Tools & Comparisons",
"datePublished": "2026-08-14",
"dateModified": "2026-08-14",
"wordCount": 2600,
"timeRequired": "PT12M",
"inLanguage": "en",
"keywords": [
"enterprise SCA tools",
"software composition analysis",
"SCA tools 2026",
"software supply chain security",
"open source dependency security",
"malware detection",
"reachability analysis",
"SBOM",
"CRA compliance",
"NIS2 compliance"
],
"image": { "@id": "https://www.aikido.dev/blog/top-enterprise-sca-tools-2026#primaryimage" },
"author": { "@id": "https://www.aikido.dev/authors/nicholas-thomson#person" },
"publisher": { "@id": "https://www.aikido.dev#organization" },
"about": [
{ "@type": "Thing", "name": "Software Composition Analysis" },
{ "@type": "Thing", "name": "Software supply chain security" },
{ "@type": "Thing", "name": "Open source dependency management" }
],
"mentions": [
{ "@type": "SoftwareApplication", "name": "Aikido Security", "applicationCategory": "SecurityApplication", "url": "https://www.aikido.dev" },
{ "@type": "SoftwareApplication", "name": "Sonatype", "applicationCategory": "SecurityApplication", "url": "https://www.sonatype.com" },
{ "@type": "SoftwareApplication", "name": "Snyk", "applicationCategory": "SecurityApplication", "url": "https://snyk.io" },
{ "@type": "SoftwareApplication", "name": "Endor Labs", "applicationCategory": "SecurityApplication", "url": "https://www.endorlabs.com" },
{ "@type": "SoftwareApplication", "name": "Checkmarx One", "applicationCategory": "SecurityApplication", "url": "https://checkmarx.com" },
{ "@type": "SoftwareApplication", "name": "Black Duck", "applicationCategory": "SecurityApplication", "url": "https://www.blackduck.com" },
{ "@type": "SoftwareApplication", "name": "Veracode", "applicationCategory": "SecurityApplication", "url": "https://www.veracode.com" },
{ "@type": "Thing", "name": "Cyber Resilience Act" },
{ "@type": "Thing", "name": "NIS2 Directive" },
{ "@type": "Thing", "name": "Software Bill of Materials" },
{ "@type": "Thing", "name": "Slopsquatting" },
{ "@type": "Thing", "name": "npm" },
{ "@type": "Thing", "name": "Shai-Hulud" }
],
"speakable": {
"@type": "SpeakableSpecification",
"cssSelector": [".faq-question", ".faq-answer"]
}
},
{
"@type": "WebPage",
"@id": "https://www.aikido.dev/blog/top-enterprise-sca-tools-2026#webpage"
"url": "https://www.aikido.dev/blog/top-enterprise-sca-tools-2026"
"name": "Top Enterprise SCA Tools 2026",
"description": "Compare the top enterprise SCA tools of 2026: Aikido, Sonatype, Snyk, Endor Labs, Checkmarx, Black Duck, and Veracode on intelligence, remediation, and compliance.",
"isPartOf": { "@id": "https://www.aikido.dev#website" },
"primaryImageOfPage": { "@id": "https://www.aikido.dev/blog/top-enterprise-sca-tools-2026#primaryimage" },
"breadcrumb": { "@id": "https://www.aikido.dev/blog/top-enterprise-sca-tools-2026#breadcrumb" },
"datePublished": "2026-08-14",
"dateModified": "2026-08-14",
"inLanguage": "en"
},
{
"@type": "ImageObject",
"@id": "https://www.aikido.dev/blog/top-enterprise-sca-tools-2026#primaryimage"
"url": "https://www.aikido.dev/images/top-enterprise-sca-tools-2026.png"
"contentUrl": "https://www.aikido.dev/images/top-enterprise-sca-tools-2026.png"
},
{
"@type": "WebSite",
"@id": "https://www.aikido.dev#website"
"url": "https://www.aikido.dev"
"name": "Aikido Security",
"publisher": { "@id": "https://www.aikido.dev#organization" },
"inLanguage": "en"
},
{
"@type": "BreadcrumbList",
"@id": "https://www.aikido.dev/blog/top-enterprise-sca-tools-2026#breadcrumb"
"itemListElement": [
{ "@type": "ListItem", "position": 1, "name": "Home", "item": "https://www.aikido.dev" },
{ "@type": "ListItem", "position": 2, "name": "Blog", "item": "https://www.aikido.dev/blog" },
{ "@type": "ListItem", "position": 3, "name": "Top Enterprise SCA Tools 2026", "item": "https://www.aikido.dev/blog/top-enterprise-sca-tools-2026" }
]
},
{
"@type": "Organization",
"@id": "https://www.aikido.dev#organization"
"name": "Aikido Security",
"url": "https://www.aikido.dev"
"logo": {
"@type": "ImageObject",
"url": "https://www.aikido.dev/logo.png"
},
"sameAs": [
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/aikido-security"
"https://x.com/AikidoSecurity"
]
},
{
"@type": "Person",
"@id": "https://www.aikido.dev/authors/nicholas-thomson#person"
"name": "Nicholas Thomson",
"url": "https://www.aikido.dev/authors/nicholas-thomson"
"jobTitle": "Senior SEO & Growth Lead",
"worksFor": { "@id": "https://www.aikido.dev#organization" },
"sameAs": [
"https://www.linkedin.com/"
"https://x.com/"
]
},
{
"@type": "ItemList",
"@id": "https://www.aikido.dev/blog/top-enterprise-sca-tools-2026#itemlist"
"name": "Top Enterprise SCA Tools 2026",
"itemListOrder": "https://schema.org/ItemListOrderAscending"
"numberOfItems": 7,
"itemListElement": [
{ "@type": "ListItem", "position": 1, "name": "Aikido Security", "url": "https://www.aikido.dev" },
{ "@type": "ListItem", "position": 2, "name": "Sonatype", "url": "https://www.sonatype.com" },
{ "@type": "ListItem", "position": 3, "name": "Snyk", "url": "https://snyk.io" },
{ "@type": "ListItem", "position": 4, "name": "Endor Labs", "url": "https://www.endorlabs.com" },
{ "@type": "ListItem", "position": 5, "name": "Checkmarx", "url": "https://checkmarx.com" },
{ "@type": "ListItem", "position": 6, "name": "Black Duck", "url": "https://www.blackduck.com" },
{ "@type": "ListItem", "position": 7, "name": "Veracode", "url": "https://www.veracode.com" }
]
},
{
"@type": "FAQPage",
"@id": "https://www.aikido.dev/blog/top-enterprise-sca-tools-2026#faq"
"mainEntity": [
{
"@type": "Question",
"name": "What is enterprise software composition analysis?",
"acceptedAnswer": {
"@type": "Answer",
"text": "It's SCA with the governance, scale, and compliance layer a large organization needs on top of the core job of finding risk in open-source dependencies. The detection is similar to any SCA tool; what makes it enterprise-grade is applying consistent policy across hundreds of repos, gating risky changes before they merge, and producing the evidence auditors expect."
}
},
{
"@type": "Question",
"name": "What makes an SCA tool enterprise-grade?",
"acceptedAnswer": {
"@type": "Answer",
"text": "Four things beyond detection: real-time intelligence that catches threats before they get a CVE, remediation that turns findings into merged fixes rather than a longer backlog, policy and gating that hold up across many teams, and portfolio-wide SBOM and license management mapped to frameworks like CRA and NIS2."
}
},
{
"@type": "Question",
"name": "How do you actually fix an SCA finding?",
"acceptedAnswer": {
"@type": "Answer",
"text": "The easy case is a version bump, and most tools can open a pull request that does it. The hard case is when no clean upgrade exists, or the fixed version introduces breaking changes. That's where tools differ: some fall back to a waiver that accepts the risk, while others can backport the fix to the version you're already running so the vulnerability is removed without a version change."
}
},
{
"@type": "Question",
"name": "Does SCA detect malware, or only known CVEs?",
"acceptedAnswer": {
"@type": "Answer",
"text": "It depends on the tool. Classic SCA matches your dependencies against a database of disclosed vulnerabilities, which misses malware almost entirely, since malicious packages are rarely assigned a CVE and are pulled from registries within hours. Tools with dedicated malware research or a real-time feed catch what CVE-matching never sees."
}
},
{
"@type": "Question",
"name": "How is SCA different from SAST?",
"acceptedAnswer": {
"@type": "Answer",
"text": "SCA covers the code you depend on, meaning your open-source and third-party components. SAST covers the code your team writes. Most real applications need both, and some platforms correlate the two to tell you whether a vulnerable dependency is actually reached by your own code."
}
},
{
"@type": "Question",
"name": "How does SCA support CRA and NIS2 compliance?",
"acceptedAnswer": {
"@type": "Answer",
"text": "Both frameworks require software transparency and supply chain security. In practice, that means generating and maintaining SBOMs, tracking license risk, and being able to show which applications are affected when a new threat lands. An accurate, queryable inventory across the whole portfolio is the evidence that satisfies an auditor."
}
}
]
}
]
}